March 26, 2006



Notes from the Armenian Language Blogosphere

Ninotsminda, Samtskhe Javakheti, Republic of Georgia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimeda 2002

By Nessuna

An anonymous local at ArmYouth Blog writes about “more than strange attitude” toward foreigners “aliens” in Armenia, who, according to the author, can be easily distinguished from the rest by their appearance.

You simply have to take a look at someone’s outer appearance. In which it is not necessary to think deeper: if your appearance is a little bit different from that of majority you are certainly not local. In order to look like a local you have to wear and act like the majority does. This is a reminder of North Korea or 1930-40’s Soviet scenes, where all people with almost strange faces, wear the same hats and jackets, just like our majority.

“Aliens” are surely treated differently. For one, it’s not unusual for them to be ripped off.

Even if you are local but have some uniqueness in your outer appearance, for sure you will be considered as an “alien”. And don’t be surprised that a bottle of beer will be more expensive for you. Well it is not difficult for a local to prove who s/he is, besides he will not make a tragedy on that. The problem is more difficult for an “alien” and especially for our kinsfolk “aliens”-Diaspora Armenians.

The reason for this is the general belief that “aliens” are rich and they can afford to spare more. The same reason is behind the stubborn persistence of street beggars to follow “aliens” sometimes all they way along Abovyan Street.

However, I believe there are positive sides of being considered a wealthy “alien”. Thus, from what I can judge, for most of the part “aliens” receive a better service in a restaurant or in a store. Moreover, they seldom, if ever, have problems with street cops or authorities. In other words, they are treated with utmost respect or simply put as citizens of a country that can and will protect their rights if needed.

For Diaspora Armenians the author coins another term “double alien”.

The latter ones [Diaspora Armenians], crashing the local reality, invent a new phenomenon - “double alien”.

Many of the Diasporan Armenians here in Armenia understand what is like to be a “double alien”. Within those countries where they come from (let it be even multicultural US), they are considered “aliens” because they try to keep their Armenian identity. They hope, though, that someday returning to Armenia they will not have to face this problem. Here it comes, the “double alienability”. It turns out that in Armenia such as in the countries where they come from, they are again “aliens”. In fact s/he turns out to be “alien” in both places. It is natural that our kinsfolk will try to choose the lesser of two evils and go back to where they come from and where at least they are “alien” and not that of “double alien”.

The author then goes on to suggest explanations for the attitudes of Armenians toward “double aliens.”

What is the reason of such attitude towards our kinsfolk “aliens”? Here are some expression-view points which are rooted stereotypes of Diasporan Armenians among majority locals: “they are spies”, “Armenians from Iran are Persians”, “they are vile”, “guys are “buts dzdzogh (pussy eaters)”, “girls are spoiled”. Such kind of expressions can be proper for any kind of person. To claim such things about a certain group of people is stupid or at least it makes an impression of intolerance. The fact that there is a growing stupidity in Armenia is obvious. An “elite” has emerged in Armenia (part of which for an unknown reason started to listen to jazz music), which consists of mostly stupid entrepreneurs and make viewpoints of certain things. Those viewpoints are as stupid as their hosts and very authentic for the rest of the not-so-elite stupid ones. In addition to all of this, one should add the ever strong and rooted communist mentality (all people should be alike) and the picture will be full.

…and to make an excellent point.

One thing is easy to understand (which I think does not acquire much mental ability), that Diaspora Armenians, like many of us living in Armenia, are simply Armenians, and Armenia is our equal native country.

Nowadays a kind of racism has emerged in Armenia, which is unknown for the rest of people living in the world. The point is that Armenians do not race a certain ethnic unity but themselves. In Armenia and Yerevan even, new different ethnic unities have started to form: in Armenia - e.g. Karabakhtsi (the most widespread ethnics), Kapantsi, Akhalqalaktsi and so on, in Yerevan – Kentrontsi, Bangladeshtci (not in reference to Bangladesh the country), Davtashentsi and so on.

The only thing that makes me happy about this all is that in near future Armenia, with its fame will one day overcome even the US as a “multicultural state”.

The full post in Armenian and English can be read here.

Ninotsminda, Samtskhe Javakheti, Republic of Georgia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimeda 2002

Over at Local Life in Armenia, Christina thinks about recent reports of an escalation in ethnic tensions between Georgians and Armenians in Samtskhe Javakheti (Javakhk). She asks “what can be done to prevent the danger” and “how can one be an active citizen?”

I have never been one, except once when in the beginning of Karabakh movement I asked the head of our school, who was also our history teacher. “Comrade Sarukhanyan, is it not a betrayal to the motherland, when Bolsheviks urge soldiers either to turn their weapons against their officers or leave the battleground?” The head of the school who was fond of me before that question, couldn’t tolerate it “Leave the classroom, girl.” It was back in 1990, but even today we have a lot to teach our children so that they not only ask “Who is Britney Spears husband?” but also “Why are we here?”

But my question today is what can be done to assist Javakhq Armenians. For how long can we do nothing? I never believed that the roles of different members and layers of society are limited to a specific function. All of us are a part of processes.
So what can I as an Armenian do to prevent the worst scenario in Javakhq?

Please don’t tell me about endless debates and beautiful speeches. While being informed is of course important the question remains what to do after you have been informed. We have talked about cross-stones in Nakhichevan; we have sent some letters to different international organizations and foreign governments, but so what? There are no cross-stones anymore, right?

So what to do now? What is an Armenian to do?

Christina’s post in Armenian can be read here.

Russian Military Base, Akhalkalaki, Samtskhe Javakheti, Republic of Georgia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimeda 2002

Ninotsminda, Samtskhe Javakheti, Republic of Georgia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimeda 2002








1 Comment »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://oneworld.blogsome.com/2006/03/26/notes-from-the-armenian-language-blogosphere-5/trackback/

  1. Thanks for the roundup, Nessuna. Some interesting posts that I’d like to comment on. Firstly, I would agree that there is more benefit to being considered a foreigner in Armenia rather than a local. In fact, I say that whenever a local asks me if I’ve applied for citizenship. Because there is no notion of citizenship here, and the rights of citizens are trampled upon on an almost daily basis, I would much rather remain a resident on a British passport. To be honest, I’m perfectly happy with the 10 year residency passport I have.

    On the otherhand, the notion of being Armenian is largely false. Or rather, it changes depending on the circumstances or situation. For example, despite being half-English and a British citizen, I am considered to be “Armenian” when most locals meet me. However, get into a disagreement with a local or object to something such as a neighbor stealing your electricity as happened to me on two occasions, and you’re quickly reclassified as a “foreigner.” Actually, I’d just prefer to be considered a “person” which leads me on to the next point.

    Although Armenia is a largely mono-ethnic country, this fixation on “Menk Hye Enk” means that national minorities are overlooked and not considered to have a legal right to living and being part of the country. Instead, there needs to be the concept of citizenship, in my opinion, although I know many Armenians will disagree. However, this notion of citizenship and having your rights and identity protected by the law and constitution leads us nicely into the issue of Samtskhe Javakheti.

    Unfortunately, there are nationalist forces in Russia, Georgia and Armenia that are trying to exploit the socio-economic situation in Javakheti for their own narrow political purposes. Nationalist forces here would like to see it turn into another Karabakh despite the fact that as one person comments on Christina’s post it would be suicide for Armenia. Likely in the event of an armed struggle in Javakheti, Armenians would lose Karabakh because it is unable to secure borders with what would be three hostile states.

    In my opinion, the issue of Samtskhe Javakheti has been hijacked by nationalist forces that rely on such issues for their support base in Armenia. They even try to exploit the issue of the Genocide by saying that Georgia is interested in expelling ethnic Armenians by bringing in Meskhetian Turks whereas in fact, this is being demanded by the Council of Europe as part of Georgia’s obligations. Some even argue that the Georgians have delayed their return because of the problems it might bring.

    Anyway, the long and the short of it is that Javakheti is not part of some historical Armenian homeland although I have heard some nationalists mistakingly say that it is. However, there is no doubt that the rights of every Georgian citizen should be equal, but it should also mean that Georgian citizens of ethnic Armenian descent should learn the Georgian language if they want to be involved in the Georgian state structures while also having their minority language rights protected.

    That’s how I see what’s happening in Georgia and I consider this obsession with ethnicity rather than citizenship as being the root cause. Throw in Russian meddling and nationalists in both Armenia and Georgia and you have a situation that can only do damage to Armenia. Approximately 90 percent of trade goes through Georgia, and if something bad were to happen, Armenia would only have Iran as its link to the outside world. Suicide.

    What can be done? Well, not stoking up a minority of ethnic Armenians in Javakheti who want this absurd idea of “unification” with Armenia. Instead I’m glad to see that the Armenian Government is working with Saakashvili to try to defuse tensions. At the same time, I’m glad to see that the Georgians are using much of their MCA funding to repair infrastructure in Javakheti. They need to tread carefully though on the issue of language and education, though, but unless Georgia becomes a federation of cantons, I don’t see why Armenians should object to learning the official language of Georgia — just as Azeris in Georgia should as well.

    Of course, more autonomy for Javakheti and allowing the use of Armenian as a second official language in the province is an option, but as long as nationalists don’t use it to demand separation from Georgia. The main issue however is socio-economic and not political. Therefore, that’s where the solution lies. Anyway, here are some useful links to more information on the situation in Samtskhe Javakheti.

    There Are Countries Interested in Worsening Armenia-Georgia Relations

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Situation in Samtskhe-Javakheti is serious. Undoubtedly, it is not so much political, as social and economic problem, expert, political scientist Stepan Grigoryan stated in an interview with a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter. In his words, social and economic problems of the region will become more acute against the background of withdrawal of the Russian military base. «I think there are countries interested in politicization of the problem and worsening the Armenia-Georgia. Armenians of Javakheti should be integrated in the political processes in Georgia. Georgian leaders should not resort to force. E.g. if the education reform is painful for the Armenian population, its implementation should be postponed,» Grigoryan remarked. At that he noted that the Armenian Government should coordinate the work with the Georgian Government, which should be interested in constant contact with Armenian ministries and departments.

    http://www.panarmenian.net/news/eng/?nid=16866

    Javakhetia: Flashpoint or Bottleneck?

    If Karabakh has played so direct a role in the recent and contemporary political life of Armenia, and in the selection of its leading political figures in particular, it is necessary to pose the question of a lesser-known Armenian-populated territory called Javakhetia in southern Georgia (Javakheti in Georgian, Javakhk in Armenian). Indeed, the Armenian national movement in Javakhetia formed in response to events in Mountainous Karabakh. Both regions are located in the republics bordering Armenia, and Armenians are the overwhelming majority of the population. Volunteers from Akhalkalaki in Javakhetia went to fight in Karabakh from the first armed clashes there.

    […]

    Javakhetia is divided into two districts called Akhalkalaki and Ninotsminda (formerly Bogdanovka), which are also the names of the district capitals that make up about 20% of the total population. Together the two districts cover about 850 square miles with a population slightly over 100,000, of which over 90% is Armenian. (Armenians settled in southern Georgia after 1828, when a treaty ceded the region from Turkey to Russia.) However, Armenians make up only about one-third of the population of Meskhetia (mostly in the Akhaltstikhe district), so that they constitute about 40% of the population of the whole administrative region called Samtskhe- Javakhetia. This region is also called Meskheti-Javakhetia. Meskhetia will be remembered as the place where the “Meskhetian Turks” lived, of whom Stalin deported all 90,000 to Central Asia in one night during World War II.

    […]

    The most radical members of Javakhk have had ties with the Armenian “Dashnak” party and demand unification with Armenia, but there is also a significant pro-Georgian faction, as well as a segment through which Russia tries to exercise influence. Neither the Armenians in Javakhetia nor those in Armenia seek to detach Javakhetia from Georgia. Leaders of the former Javakhk mainstream agree that tensions are rooted in social problems, and feel that deeper ties with Armenia may help to resolve these. Earlier this year, President Kocharian of Armenia said that his country could indeed play a role in relieving the socio-economic tension in the region, for example through providing electricity, road-building and even school teachers. However, Armenia does not support the demands of some in Javakhetia for the region to obtain a separate administrative status within Georgia.

    http://www.robertcutler.org/consult/topical/ge9912jv.htm

    Georgia: Foreign Aid Challenge

    Georgia has been awarded the money by the Millennium Challenge Account, MCA. It is one of only a handful of countries to have received funds from the new US aid programme.

    The initiative is the Bush administration’s ambitious, and controversial, new plan for distributing foreign aid to countries that have made considerable advances towards building democracy. Its priorities are to develop regional infrastructures and private sector initiatives.

    Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili and US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice attended a high-profile ceremony at New York’s Waldorf Astoria hotel last month, where they signed a “compact”, laying out the parameters of the programme. (The full text of the compact can be found at http://www.mca.gov/compacts/091205GeorgiaCompact.pdf.)

    The money will be administered by the Millennium Challenge Corporation, MCC - a “government corporation” in the words of the official website (www.mca.gov) - and its Georgian partner, Millennium Challenge Georgia, MCG.

    MCG’s offices are in Tbilisi, but the majority of its employees will be working far from the capital, in the mountainous region of Samtskhe-Javakheti. Almost half the funding award will be spent on improvements to this region where over 90 per cent of the population in the southern half is ethnic Armenian.

    These people speak only the most rudimentary Georgian, which, combined with very bad roads and a weak infrastructure, has meant that the province has become isolated from the rest of the country. The lack of integration has led to local interethnic tensions.

    Lasha Shanidze, executive director of MCG, told IWPR, “The situation with the roads has forced them [the Armenians] into a position where it is easier for them to go to Yerevan to sell their produce or get medical treatment than to do that in their own capital city [Tbilisi].”

    Over a third of the money will go towards repairing the 245 kilometres of roads that cross Samtskhe-Javakheti, including the main artery connecting the regional centre Alkhakalaki to Tbilisi, as well as other major routes to Armenia and Turkey.

    http://www.iwpr.net/?p=crs&s=f&o=257624&apc_state=henicrs200510

    By the way, I remember someone writing recently that when dozens of Armenians get attacked or killed in Russia by nationalists, nobody says a word and certainly doesn’t attack Russia or Putin. When a drunken fight happens in Georgia and an Armenian gets killed, nationalists start calling for war.

    It’s a good point and sums up what exactly is behind all of this. Sorry to say, but talk such as the following disapoints me and illustrates why Armenia might well suffer in the long run unless it shakes off what some Georgians call a “Serbian mentality.”

    Incidently, they also think the Azeris have the same mentality as well.

    Armenia Will Have To Open Second Front In Case Of Emergency, Javakhk Says

    “It is a matter of survival of Armenia, as Javakhk (region) is the only way for communication with Europe. We understand that if the Armenians leave the region, the Turks will settle here. It will equal to complete isolation of Armenia”, Razdan Madoian said.

    According to him, there are two options for further developments – it might become another Nakhitchevani (place of Armenian genocide) or the Nagorno-Karabakh, and if Armenia wants to retain its position in the region, it must maintain whatever Armenian is left.

    He claimed that the Armenian troops must invade in the region in case of necessity.

    When asked about the possible second front for Armenia, Gagik Ginosian, representative of the Council said that it would be the forth one for Georgia.

    One must not be afraid of war when there is a challenge to lose a motherland and national dignity. As for Javakhk, the matte is about survival of Armenia, he said.

    Thankfully, though, there are some moderate Armenian voices in Javakheti.

    Van Baiburt, Georgian MP of Armenian origin says that the tension in the region, which is mainly populated with Armenians, was artificial.

    […]

    According to him, the sponsors of the rally were enemies both for Georgia and Armenia.

    http://eng.primenewsonline.com/?c=121&a=6819

    I am especially glad to see that the Armenian and Georgian governments are working together to prevent the situation from spiralling out of control.

    Armenia, Georgia Mull Joint Efforts To Ease Hardship In Javakheti

    Prime Minister Andranik Markarian ended on Monday a two-day visit to Georgia that focused on Tbilisi’s and Yerevan’s joint efforts to improve the socioeconomic situation in the country’s Javakheti region predominantly populated by Armenians.

    Markarian met with President Mikhail Saakashvili and parliaments speaker Nino Burjanadze in Tbilisi the day after touring the impoverished area bordering Armenia and Turkey together with his Georgian counterpart, Zurab Noghaideli.

    A Georgian parliamentarian of Armenian descent who was present at the talks described them as “productive.” “The Georgian side is very happy that Armenia is expressing readiness to render financial and economic assistance to the region,” Van Bayburt told RFE/RL from Tbilisi.

    […]

    Javakheti’s grave socioeconomic problems are compounded by the extremely poor condition of local roads that have hardly undergone major repairs since the Soviet collapse. Officials announced that the Georgian government will finally start to rebuild them in 2007 with financial assistance which it expects to receive under the U.S. government’s Millennium Challenge Account program. Armenia and Georgia are the only ex-Soviet states eligible for the scheme.

    “I think road construction should take between two and three years,” Noghaideli told reporters. “The Americans will start [financing it] from 2007. The road construction will be very intensive here.”

    The two governments are also making plans for the reconstruction of local secondary schools that have long fallen into disrepair. Officials said a joint plan of actions will be finalized this September.

    However, road and school repairs alone would not address Javakheti’s number one problem: unemployment. Scores of local residents have left for Russia and other parts of the former Soviet Union in search of jobs over the past 15 years. “Few young people are left here,” an elderly man in the village of Gandza complained to Markarian. “They want to build a school but there are no students.”

    “Things will get better, don’t worry,” the Armenian premier replied.

    The region’s single largest employer, a Russian military base in Akhalkalaki is to be closed in 2008 under a Russian-Georgian agreement signed recently. The government in Tbilisi has pledged to cushion the resulting loss of hundreds of jobs.

    Saakashvili said earlier this month that Javakheti farmers will become the principal suppliers of agriculture produce to the Georgian army. According to Bayburt, the Armenian and Georgian governments also plan to set up several food processing plants in the largely agricultural area.

    “We need to provide opportunities for economic development and we are doing that,” said Noghaideli. “I think that in three or four years this region will change beyond recognition.”

    […]

    Speaker Burjanadze welcomed an Armenian proposal for the two governments to set up a commission that will look into the matter on a case-by-case basis. “All people in Armenia and Georgia, including Samtskhe-Javakheti, must realize that if they incite tension between the Armenian and Georgian populations, they will play into the hands of our enemies,” she said without elaborating.

    Markarian likewise urged a group of Javakheti Armenians to be “prudent and realistic.” “Do not think that everyone is our friend,” he said. “We and the Georgian people will build our future and strengthen our states by ourselves.”

    http://www.armenialiberty.org/armeniareport/report/en/2005/07/ADDD9D52-0C40-458F-8C66-356F7C26560B.ASP

    Comment by Onnik — March 26, 2006 @ 5:45 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Comments are currently moderated. If your comment does not appear immediately, there is no need to submit it again.

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


         

 







banner

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any publication or organization that he may be working for now, in the past or in the future.