October 2, 2006



Georgia: Suspected Russian Spies Released

Civil Georgia now reports that the earlier BBC report was correct. Georgian President has agreed to hand over the four Russians military officers suspected of spying to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

Georgia will release four Russian military officers arrested on espionage charges, President Saakashvili said on October 2 after talks with visiting OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Belgian Foreign Minister Karel De Gucht.

But he stressed that release of the Russia officers is “a good gesture towards our western friends,” and not a response to threats voiced by Russia’s leaders.

“The agreement has been reached to hand over arrested Russian officers to the OSCE, to the OSCE Chairman-in-Office,” Saakashvili said.

Posted by Onnik @ 6:12 pm. Filed under: Georgia, Politics, Caucasus, Russia







7 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://oneworld.blogsome.com/2006/10/02/georgia-suspected-russian-spies-released/trackback/

  1. Russian, U.S. Presidents Discuss Georgia other » News «

    / Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 2006-10-02 18:14:29

    Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President George W. Bush discussed the current situation in Georgia during a telephone conversation on October 2, according to the Russian President’s press office.

    No other details were reported.

    http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=13737

    Comment by Onnik — October 2, 2006 @ 7:41 pm

  2. Latest press release from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) - http://www.osce.org

    *** OSCE Chairman eases tensions by brokering transfer of Russian military officers from Georgia to Russia ***

    TBILISI, 2 October 2006 - The OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Belgian Foreign Minister Karel De Gucht, flew to Georgia today and brokered the return to Russia of four Russian military officers charged with espionage.

    Georgian officials handed the Russian officers over to Minister De Gucht in the presence of Russian diplomats and the Head of the OSCE Mission to Georgia, Ambassador Roy Reeve. The officers were then driven in OSCE vehicles to Tbilisi international airport, where they boarded a special Russian flight out of Georgia.

    “I’m pleased we were able to find a solution to this issue and help defuse the considerable tension which was growing between the two States,” said Minister De Gucht. “Conflict prevention is a main focus for the OSCE. In terms of our comprehensive security agenda it was logical and vital to help effectively manage this crisis.”

    The Chairman-in-Office had been in close contact since last Friday with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, Georgian Foreign Minister Gela Bezhuashvili, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, US State Secretary Condeleeza Rice and European Union High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solona, to try to ease tensions. Minister De Gucht flew to Tbilisi from Brussels and met Minister Bezhuashvili and President Saakashvili before the Russian officers were handed over.

    Relations between Russia and Georgia - both participating States in the 56-nation Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe - had deteriorated markedly since the warrants for arrest and detentions on 27 September of several Russian military officers. Georgia charged them with espionage. Russia responded by recalling its Ambassador to Georgia and starting to evacuate diplomatic staff and families. It also stopped issuing visas to Georgian citizens.

    The OSCE Chairman-in-Office urged the two States to abide by the principles of international law, to refrain from provocations and to resume dialogue, saying: “Much work remains to be done to put the important relations between these two neighbours on a stronger footing, not least by lowering the rhetorical volume. The OSCE remains ready to assist where possible.”

    The Chairman-in-Office also called on the parties to restore confidence and revitalize negotiations aimed at finding a settlement for the conflict in Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia, Georgia. He welcomed the readiness of Georgia to hold a meeting at the highest level between the parties at the initiative of the OSCE Chairmanship, but added that he was aware the details of this meeting still needed to be negotiated.

    For PDF attachments or links to sources of further information, please visit: http://www.osce.org/item/20853.html

    For further information contact:

    Martin Nesirky - Spokesperson
    Press and Public Information Section
    Kaerntner Ring 5-7A-1010 Vienna, Austria
    Tel.: +43 1 514 36 0(office) +43 664 859 08 26(mobile)
    Fax: +43-1 514 36 105
    E-mail: spokesperson@osce.org

    Rudy Huygelen - Spokesperson
    Press service of the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    Karmelietenstraat / Rue des Petits Carmes 151000 Brussels, Belgium
    Tel.: +32 477 403 212(mobile)
    Fax: +32-2 513 25 46
    E-mail: presse@diplobel.fed.be

    Francois Dumont - Deputy Spokesperson
    Press service of the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    Karmelietenstraat / Rue des Petits Carmes 151000 Brussels, Belgium
    Tel.: +32 475 727 635(mobile) +32 2 501 80 42(office)
    Fax: +32 2 513 25 46
    E-mail: presse@diplobel.fed.be

    Bruno Jans - Deputy Spokesperson
    Press service of the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    Karmelietenstraat / Rue des Petits Carmes 151000 Brussels, Belgium
    Tel.: +32-2 501 84 03(office)
    E-mail: presse@diplobel.fed.be

    Comment by Onnik — October 2, 2006 @ 7:53 pm

  3. I bet there are some politicians and businessmen in Armenia who would benefit from a tighter blockade. They can blame their incompetence on outside forces, leaving corruption issues sidelined.

    Who knows, maybe it’s a blessing in disguise. Since our primary trade route will be blocked, it’s an opportunity to lower our dependency on Georgia, we can focus a bit more on Iran, perhaps the ridiculous profiteering involved to transport through Georgian territories might be a thing of the past.

    Comment by Esoteric — October 3, 2006 @ 3:06 am

  4. Right, there will be some individuals in Armenia who will benefit from a tighter blockade, but many others who won’t — i.e. read much of the population. As for a blessing in disguise, not really. Build up trade routes with Iran and lower our dependency on Georgia?

    Well, maybe were it not for a few things such as mountainous terrain in the south making travel in the Winter not only slow but dangerous, and of course the fact that the railway from Yerevan to Iran goes through Nakhichevan so its non-functional.

    And of course, many people would warn agains putting all Armenian eggs in an Iranian basket in case we find ourselves blockaded on all borders. Basically, Iran isn’t exactly a good choice for planning long-term trade with given the post-911 world.

    Instead, the argument — which is kind of the same as what you’re saying — is that there is the need to diversify and spread trade routes out. Actually, when something like this happens, the effect of the closed border with Turkey becomes more apparent.

    Comment by Onnik — October 3, 2006 @ 1:57 pm

  5. I personally don’t see any other basket to put our eggs in.

    If you’re suggesting trade with Turkey, that’s a pretty morbid thought. From a political and economic standpoint it would be suicide to negotiate border reopening with Turkey.

    We would have to make some serious compromises that would destroy all that we’ve worked for over the last 90 years. Besides the flood of Turkish products and the destruction of local industry, all hope of moral justice will be lost.

    Comment by Esoteric — October 3, 2006 @ 3:40 pm

  6. We would have to make some serious compromises that would destroy all that we’ve worked for over the last 90 years.

    The border was not closed by Armenia and is not being kept closed by Armenia either. Besides, the Georgian-Turkish border is open and Georgia is not flooded with Turkish products. Simply, whether the border opening would adversely affect Armenia has more to do with the internal economic and trade policies of the Government otherwise every country would close their borders. Perhaps Canada should close its border with the U.S, for example.

    Anyway, the Armenian Government wants the border open as do most Armenian businessmen. It is necessary for the economy to grow in most areas and the Russian border closure with Georgia makes this more important. The Iranian border isn’t going to help much because it will just add time and extra costs thus making goods most expensive both ways. Likewise, given U.S. policy towards Iran, it’s quite a gamble.

    I daresay that if the Russian-Georgian border remains closed for some time then many businessmen as well as Government officials will highlight the need for the Turkish border to be opened. That said, we’re missing the point. Armenia must make it clear to Russia in no uncertain terms that it must not blockade Georgia unless it wants to force Armenia into looking in other directions for its survival.

    Iran is a non-starter. Communication is only via road, and only certain goods and services such as electricity and gas are really viable in terms of importing and expecting. Ironically, it’s these two commodities that might bring Armenia, Georgia and Iran closer together and this week or last, the Ministers of Energy of all three of these countries signed an agreement in this regard. But basically, you’re arguing the same as many critics of Moscow.

    What you’re saying is it’s time for Armenia to move away from dependency on Russia and to look elsewhere. I would say, however, that opening a border and establishing diplomatic links does not mean forgetting historical problems as Kocharian even explained in his interview with Al Jazeera.

    hoj: According to a certain viewpoint, the issue of the Armenian Genocide recognition has been brought up only recently, coinciding with the negotiation of Turkish membership to the European Union.

    Kocharian: The issue of the Genocide recognition has been there for a long time. Maybe lately it was discussed in a wider context. Armenia as an independent state has expressed its position in 1998 in the United Nations …

    This was long time before Turkey’s negotiation with the European Union. Therefore I do not want to directly connect the two issue, but during the period of Turkey’s negotiations to join the European Union the subject of Turkey evaluating its own history is brought forward.

    This is why we are awaiting the expression of repentance on what happened. There should be a conscious and rightful evaluation of the past, in order to avoid repetition of these mistakes in the future.

    Shoj: In your opinion is that enough to start normal relations with Turkey and how would you evaluate the nature of these relations today with Ankara?

    Kocharian: Today there are no relations. Our position is very clear. We are ready to build up diplomatic relations with Turkey today and without any preconditions … But the Turkish side insists on preconditions such as: agreement with Azerbaijan, withdrawal from Karabagh … These are unacceptable conditions …

    The Greeks could do the same by refusing trade with Turkey if no serious steps were taken in the resolution of the Cypriot Problem, but international experience has showed that common trade and cooperation always help in surpassing the difficulties. For example, there is the Coral Islands problem between Russia and Japan but no side regards this as a condition to establish commercial relations.

    Or, of course, by the same logic applied to the Armenia-Turkish border, have the Russians done Georgia a favour by closing the border and all communication links? Actually, and somewhat ironically, in the eyes of Europe and the United States, perhaps they have. It might bring more support for them, but I wonder, if the border remains closed for long, what will Yerevan have to do?

    Comment by Onnik — October 3, 2006 @ 4:11 pm

  7. « insert alot of - yeses, I agrees, humming, umms and ahhs - here »

    “Without any preconditions…” Either that’s early signs of delusion, or desperation.

    “The border was not closed by Armenia and is not being kept closed by Armenia either.” Ignoring EU pressure for a second; what’s going to convince the Turks to open the border if the Artsakh issue isn’t resolved? Concession rings a bell.

    There’s also political/economic pressuring once the border is open again. When I think of Armenia, a recurring theme of “putty” keeps popping-up. The EU angle is a Golden-Hammer-of-Thor opportunity, if we lose it, I think we can say good-night aspirations.

    Also, you used Canada as a comparison to Armenia; relativity mate. Canada is a whole world apart, in more ways than one… Although I would highly recommend the Canadian government close their border, build a 20 foot high wall along it and stop accepting “free”-”trade” “agreements”.

    Anyway, neighbourly relations with the formation of the Israeli-Turkish-Georgian-Azeri BTC bloc makes for some slim pickings, that’s for sure. Especially with so much riding on it (oil, gas, water).

    Iiiii dunno; my opinion is that justice can never be grey, maybe I’m just too black and white minded.

    Comment by Esoteric — October 3, 2006 @ 6:11 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Comments are currently moderated. If your comment does not appear immediately, there is no need to submit it again.

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


         

 







banner

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any publication or organization that he may be working for now, in the past or in the future.