October 27, 2006



7 Years On — 27 October 1999

27_october_0001

State Funeral of Vazgen Sarkisyan, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimedia 1999

RFE/RL reports that the relatives of those slain in the 27 October 1999 terrorist attack on the Armenian National Assembly still believe that there was a high level cover-up to conceal the identity of those behind the assassination of several high level government officials. Among those killed were then Prime Minister, Vazgen Sarkisyan, and Speaker of Parliament, former Soviet era leader of Armenia Karen Demirchyan.

The eight men were shot dead on October 27, 1999 moments after gunmen led by an obscure former journalist, Nairi Hunanian, burst into the National Assembly and sprayed it with bullets. Although all five gunmen were arrested the next day and sentenced to life imprisonment in December 2003, there are still nagging questions about whether they acted alone or had some powerful backers. Military prosecutors that investigated the shootings appeared to believe in the latter theory, arresting but subsequently releasing several other individuals, including President Robert Kocharian’s former chief of staff.

[…]

Friends and relatives of Sarkisian and Demirchian, whose Miasnutyun (Unity) alliance swept to a landslide victory in the May 1999 parliamentary elections, were quick to point the finger at Kocharian, triggering a bitter power struggle that ended in the president’s victory in May 2000. They continue to suspect Kocharian and his chief lieutenant, Defense Minister Serzh Sarkisian, of involvement in the crime, citing the authorities’ controversial handling of the criminal inquiry and the ensued trial. Kocharian and his political allies have repeatedly rejected such suggestions.

“The trial only deepened, rather than dispelled the public’s suspicions, and the severe consequences of October 27 continue to be felt today,” Demirchian’s son Stepan, who was Kocharian’s main challenger in the 2003 presidential election, said after laying flowers at his hugely popular father’s grave. “The authorities have done everything not to establish the truth and to cover up the crime,” he told reporters.

Sarkisian’s brother Aram, who leads the radical opposition Hanrapetutyun, was careful not to directly implicate anyone in the bloodbath, but made no secret of his suspicions. “They did nothing to prevent October 27, and they did everything not to solve the crime,” he said.

Anahit Bakhshian, the wife of the assassinated vice-speaker Yuri Bakhshian, went farther, claiming that one should look for the “organizers” of the parliament attack within Armenia’s current leadership.

Prime Minister Andranik Markarian, who had accused the Kocharian camp of obstructing justice before being name prime minister in May 2000, shrugged off the statement. “She repeats the same thing each year,” he said. “If such suspicions had been substantiated, the organizers would have already been identified.”

The full article is available here, and I’ll try to post more on the seventh anniversary with photographs from the State Funeral for the victims over the weekend. In the meantime, A1 Plus has an excerpt from video of the assassinations here. In the seven years since the assassinations I had forgotten how savage the killings were, but this video clip quickly brings back memories of that day and its aftermath.

Internews also has a chronology of events from October 1999 here.

27 october 0001

27 october 0003

Yerevan, Republic of Armenia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimedia 1999

Posted by Onnik @ 11:59 pm. Filed under: Armenia, Caucasus, Photography, Terrorism, History, Crime






2 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://oneworld.blogsome.com/2006/10/27/7-years-on/trackback/

  1. RFE/RL’s Press Review summarizes newspaper coverage of the 7th Anniversary of the 27 October 1999 assassinations.

    The seventh anniversary of the infamous attack on the Armenian parliament makes headlines in most of Friday’s newspapers.

    “When relatives of the victims continue to suggest various theories [of the crime] seven years on and at least three or four of those theories seem credible, we and those responsible for our country’s security have a lot of food for thought,” writes “Azg.” “And if there is a cover-up, if interests of big powers have grown intertwined with the tragedy and if only several persons know about that but do not want to speak up, the state, the statehood, its leaders and people are under a serious threat. Because those interests will always exist in the region and our country, and even a small state must be able to ensure its security in a way that would leave its people with no doubts about their and their leaders’ security.”

    Anahit Bakhshian, the widow of the assassinated deputy parliament speaker Yuri Bakhshian, tells “Aravot” that the official investigation into the shootings and the trial of the gunmen left many key questions unanswered. “Who let the terrorists smuggle weapons and reach the parliament floor?” she asks. “Who killed [parliament deputy Armenak] Armenakian? Why was the site of his murder quickly cleaned up and repaired?” “The trial was covered [by pro-government media] in accordance with the will and the interests of certain people,” keen to hide the truth, adds Bakhshian.

    “Hayk” believes that the masterminds of the crime have not been identified. “But no secret has a long life,” editorializes the paper. “This one will be uncovered too.”

    “Iravunk” recalls that “mysterious incidents” occurred even after October 27, 1999. “People got electrocuted or hanged in prisons,” says the paper. “Important witnesses suddenly found themselves in the USA or died. Questions are numerous and we will hardly get their answers soon.”

    According to “Zhamanak Yerevan,” the parliament shootings marked a “watershed” in the history of independent Armenia. “[October] 27 clarified who stands where in this country and why,” explains the paper. “It has become absolutely clear that a military-police state is being created in both in Armenia and Karabakh .”

    “Haykakan Zhamanak” reports that ceremonies marking the attack anniversary will not involve “events of political nature.” “Of course, this situation has been going on for several years, but we think it would not hurt if there were discussions aimed at finding out whether the public and political forces consider the crime to be solved and whether comments made in connection with this in the past remain in force,” says the paper.

    Comment by Onnik — October 29, 2006 @ 9:10 pm

  2. RFE/RL’s Press Review now has more on the 7th Anniversary:

    “Hayk” continues to comment on the seventh anniversary of the 1999 terrorist attack on the Armenian parliament which it says plunged the country into a continuing “moral decline.” The opposition paper accuses the state propaganda machine of promoting and glorifying the “organizers of the terrorist act” and discrediting its victims. “And we wonder how the scum has taken over during a short period of time, while those who fight for justice have been eliminated from scene,” writes the paper. “We should not be surprised.”

    According “168 Zham,” lingering suspicions about senior government officials’ involvement in the parliament massacre remain “timely.” “But the thing is that this scarce information not substantiated by concrete material seems to be satisfying everyone,” says the paper. “Nobody is aggressively demanding a number of answers regarding the October 27 attack anymore.”

    Comment by Onnik — October 30, 2006 @ 11:51 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Comments are currently moderated. If your comment does not appear immediately, there is no need to submit it again.

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


         

 






banner

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any publication or organization that he may be working for now, in the past or in the future.