November 6, 2006



Corruption: No Change in Armenia

Transparency International, the world’s leading anti-corruption watchdog, today released its annual Corruption Perception Index (CPI). According to the organization based in Germany but with a Chapter in Armenia, there is no progress in the fight against corruption here. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s English language site has more.

An international anti-corruption watchdog has ranked Armenia 93rd among 163 nations by its level of corruption, which is neither progress nor regress against last year’s study results.

In the rankings released on Monday Transparency International cited its annual Corruption Perceptions Index study in which Armenia has the index score of 2.9 along with Argentina, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Eritrea, Syria and Tanzania.

The index score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people and country analysts and ranges between zero, which is highly corrupt, and 10, which is very clean.

Amalia Kostanian, head of the Armenian branch of Transparency International, says the findings reflect only the opinions of entrepreneurs and experts.

“Our studies evaluating public opinion depict a grimmer picture. We have received much more negative data and will publish it soon,” she told RFE/RL.

Kostanian describes the work of the anti-corruption commission in 2006 as ineffective and says that it met only once in the last ten months.

Interestingly, while Armenia remains at the same level as last year, some progress is registered in Azerbaijan and Georgia. Last year, Armenia’s two neighbours in the South Caucasus scored 2.0 and 2.3, but this year their position improved with 2.4 and 2.8, respectively.

In 2004 their scores were 1.9 and 2.0, so that’s really quite a change — although still nothing to be proud of.

At this rate, while Azerbaijan will probably always remain more corrupt than Armenia, Georgia will likely surpass Armenia in the next few years, proving beyond a doubt that political will to combat corruption is crucial. Given Transparency International’s recent presentation in Yerevan, I think it’s pretty obvious that there’s no real interest in fighting corruption here.

Anyway, some interviews from 2004 with the Chairperson, Amalia Kostanyan, and Executive Director, Sona Ayvazyan, of Transparency International’s branch in Armenia are available here, here, and here. The Center for Regional Development / Transparency International Armenia has a web site here.

Posted by Onnik @ 10:06 pm. Filed under: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Corruption, Caucasus







2 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://oneworld.blogsome.com/2006/11/06/corruption-no-change-in-armenia/trackback/

  1. A1 Plus has more:

    «SERGE SARGSYAN IS A CORRUPT OFFICIAL»
    [07:32 pm] 06 November, 2006

    Defense Minister Serge Sargsyan uses his administrative and personal means in order to reach his aims. According to Amalya Kostanyan, Armenian representative of «Transparency International», this is political corruption, as according to the definition of the organization, «abuse of the state rank with the aim of personal benefit is corruption».

    According to the representative of «Transparency International», the pre-election campaign which has already started non-officially is also political corruption. The data of «Transparency International» claim that the most corrupt field is that of political parties.

    The political control over Mass Media, fabrications during the elections, and voting of people who are not registered in the electoral area is also corruption, Amalya Kostanyan announced in the National Press Club.

    According to the report of «Transparency International», the Corruption Perceptions Index is 2.9 but our country is among those where corruption is widespread, despite the fact that Armenia has been realizing an anti-corruption strategic program for the last three years. «The investigations carried our in Armenia once in every three years since 1999 show that level corruption is rising», Amalya Kostanyan said.

    Nevertheless, the index of Armenia is lower than that of Georgia (2.8), Azerbaijan (2.4) and Turkey (2.8).

    Comment by Onnik — November 6, 2006 @ 10:50 pm

  2. People interviewed for corruption is quite limited , thus study has limited value…but , I hope that business people would like to see it improved….

    Comment by Garo — November 8, 2006 @ 2:01 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Comments are currently moderated. If your comment does not appear immediately, there is no need to submit it again.

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


         

 







banner

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any publication or organization that he may be working for now, in the past or in the future.