May 15, 2007



Local Observers Assessment Largely Positive

It’s Your Choice, Armenia’s largest domestic election observation mission, has also announced that it largely considers Saturday’s election a vast improvement over previous ones. Again, as I mentioned in my previous post, this does not mean that there weren’t significant problems either, but the main thing is that you just can’t compare them to other votes in Armenia. RFE/RL has more.

The non-governmental organization It’s Your Choice (IYC) monitored the election campaign and deployed about 4,000 observers in most of the polling stations across the country on voting day.

“These elections were better and took place in a more civilized atmosphere than the past elections,” the IYC chairman, Harutiun Hambartsumian, told RFE/RL, presenting their preliminary findings. “Of course, there were shortcomings, violations. But there was a clear improvement.”

Hambartsumian said the Armenian authorities failed to create a level playing field for all major contenders and used their control of election commissions and other “government resources” to retain a comfortable majority in the National Assembly. He said IYC observers did not witness instances of vote buying which opposition parties claim were widespread. But he said they did see busloads of people transported to polling stations.

“There was busing of individuals to polling stations that became overcrowded, complicating the voting process,” Hambartsumian said. “Besides, our observers saw ballot stuffing attempts in a number of polling stations. There were also instances of multiple voting.”

“Since those violations were not widespread, they could not have affected election results,” he added.

Anyway, this time round, two of IYC’s observers have actually posted their impressions of the election. Although I’ve already linked to this post by Nareg at Cilicia.com’s Life in Armenia before, it’s worth linking to it again.

Well, it was awfully tiring, but I have to say I was terribly impressed, and felt proud, because, before going in as an observer, I was expecting to see the most khaydarag, utterly ridiculous things as usual, and I was even looking forward to a nice fight with the authorities, but things went so smoothly, it was so clean, so just… I mean, I’ve been hearing reports from elsewhere, and the Lord alone knows what we are to expect in the next few weeks in terms of accusations and rallies, but all I know is, I have not lost my faith in the Armenian people and democracy, as I expected I would.

Over at Life Around Me, Zarchka also posts her experiences. Incidentally, at all the polling stations I visited on election day I made a point of locating the IYC observer in every one. Apart from Noragavit where I couldn’t find the observer when I was there, all of them said there had been no problems up until the point I arrived. They were also quite calm, unlike during other elections I’ve seen them in action for.

Anyway.







3 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://oneworld.blogsome.com/2007/05/15/local-observers-assessment-largely-positive/trackback/

  1. Paradoxically, Nareg was observing the election for IYC as a Diasporan observer recruited by the Center for Regional Development / Transparency International (CRD-TI Armenia) yet, while both he and IYC seem to agree with the conclusion of the OSCE/ODIHR observers, CRD-TI Armenia doesn’t.

    “Civilized parliamentary election” camouflages mass falsifications and violations, Amalia Kostanyan, chairman of Transparency- Armenia, said at a press conference, Monday.

    “The country’s election system is controlled by high-ranking officials. This has become a reason for open bribery of voters, including by political figures,” she said. On May 12 people informed some public organizations that the persons representing some parties bribed voters, she said. However, the information was anonymous due to the atmosphere of overall fear reigning in the country. At the same time, there were people ready to sell their votes for a definite amount of money. For instance, she mentioned a call by a woman who plead a public organization to help her get a 15,000 AMD bribe as, in her words, “the bribe came short when it was her turn to get it.” “Thus, although politicians speak of democratic values and free and transparent election, in reality, we become witnesses of their quite-opposite behavior,” A. Kostanyan said.

    According to a sociological poll conducted by Transparency International Center for Anti-corruption Research and Initiatives, the election system in Armenia was the most corrupted in 2006, 73.9% of respondents say. They mentioned imperfect legislation, lack of punishment mechanisms and public tolerance to this phenomenon as main reasons of wide-spread corruption.

    Anyway, all of the Diasporan observers I’ve spoken to so far don’t seem to agree with CRD-TI Armenia, and nor does IYC itself. Anyway, if bribes were distributed and I think they were, people took them quite gladly and willingly went to the polls to vote. As most observers say that the polling stations were calm I don’t think this argument about an “atmosphere of fear” stands up too well. Only in one polling station I visited was the situation tense.

    Of course, it’s still a violation of the electoral code and also means that the percentages of the vote for the other parties are far less than they should be, but I do believe people who took the bribes wouldn’t have voted for the opposition or at all without them. Now all I can hope for is that Orinats Yerkir and Heritage become the viable opposition that any country needs for its democratization. They don’t have many seats, of course, but I hope that they can use their positions to help restore the trust of the population in the political system.

    Let’s see.

    Comment by Onnik — May 15, 2007 @ 2:57 pm

  2. May 12 parliamentary election in Armenia have become not the victory of the authorities but the defeat of the opposition, the National-Democratic party says in its statement, received by ArmInfo today. To recall, the NDPA, headed by Savarsh Kocharyan, which “broke off away” from the National-Democratic Union in 2001 and called itself oppositional, could not overcome the required 5% threshold to enter the Parliament.

    According to the statement, May 12 election were organized by the authorities “normally in outward appearance” but with “previously controlled” results. Psychological pressure was used by the authorities during these election instead of physical pressure used at the previous ones. At the same time, using the bicycle technology, the authorities exaggerated the number of electors, having participated in the voting, one and a half times, and just these artificial votes were fixed in favour of the power parties. But even under conditions of absence of open fraud, victory of the opposition raises doubt, the statement says. According to NDPA’s estimation, the parliamentary election in Armenia have become not victory of the authorities but the defeat of the opposition. The main reason for this defeat lies in the fact that the oppositional forces could not join around the alternative ideology and programmes.

    Comment by Onnik — May 15, 2007 @ 3:09 pm

  3. THERE WERE VIOLATIONS, BUT NOT ESSENTIAL
    By N. Petrosian

    AZG Armenian Daily
    15/05/2007

    On may 13 “The Vote is YOURS!” NGO published the preliminary results of monitoring of the parliamentary elections. The NGO stated that the process of voting and of calculating the votes was conducted in peaceful democratic atmosphere. There were certain mistakes and law offences outside the election centers, but they had very little influence on the voting results.

    As negative factors of the elections “The Vote is YOURS!” pointed out that the candidates were not given equal conditions for pre-election campaign, low number of alternative candidates at certain election centers, unbalanced proportions of electoral committee members, psychological pressure upon the voters (certain parties tried to “bribe” the voters rendering them humanitarian aid), low attention of the mass media to the election campaign.

    In spite of all the violations, the NGO marked certain positive changes, which displayed the will of both the political powers and the voters to hold fair and democratic elections. The representatives of the “The Vote is YOURS!” organization, which has over 4 thousand volunteers in 10 regions of the Republic of Armenia, stated that the violations had no effect on the results of the elections and that
    Armenia’s progress on the way to democracy is obvious.

    Comment by Onnik — May 15, 2007 @ 9:35 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Comments are currently moderated. If your comment does not appear immediately, there is no need to submit it again.

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


         

 






banner

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any publication or organization that he may be working for now, in the past or in the future.