October 19, 2007



An Open Letter to the Armenian Diaspora

Via Amerikan Turk, I stumbled upon an open letter to the Armenian Diaspora by Turkish writer, Mustafa Akyol. Of course, the subject of the letter is not hard to guess. It concerns the Armenian Genocide and is obviously written as a result of House Resolution 106. Before quoting from the letter which was also published by the Turkish Daily News, however, it’s interesting to read up on Akyol.

Mustafa Akyol is a Turkish Muslim writer, who argues both against Islamic extremism and extreme secularism and is an outspoken promoter of intelligent design.

Akyol was born in Ankara in 1972 and had his early education there. He later graduated from the Istanbul Nişantaşı Anadolu Lisesi and the International Relations Department of Bosphorus University. He earned his masters in the History Department of the same university.

[…]

In the past years he has given seminars in several universities in the U.S. and the UK on issues of faith, science, religious tolerance or inter-faith dialogue.

Mustafa Akyol’s articles on Islamic issues, in which he mostly argues against Islamic extremism and terrorism from a Muslim point of view and defends the Islamic faith, have appeared in publications like The Weekly Standard, The Washington Times, The American Enterprise, National Review, FrontPage Magazine and Islam Online. He lives in Istanbul and is currently working on a book titled An Islamic Case for Liberty, which he plans to have published in 2007.

Anyway, although many Armenians in the Diaspora will take exception to some if not all of what Akyol writes, I for one am glad that the letter is moderate and also an attempt to reach out to explain why many Turks react so strongly to the campaign to recognize the Armenian Genocide. Certainly, it is an attempt to initiate some kind of communication, discussion and debate.

A few days ago a new friend of mine who happens to be an American Armenian played some beautiful songs for me that come from the deepest roots of her ethnic tradition. While I enjoyed the numinous rhythms of that magnetic Armenian music, I realized how similar they were to the tunes of the Turkish classical music that I have grown up hearing. “Despite all the political warfare,” I said to myself, “alas, look how similar we are.” I actually have a similar feeling when I drive along the magnificent mosques and palaces of Istanbul, some of which were built by Armenian architects – men in fez who devoutly worshipped Christ and proudly served the Sultan.

Well, we were the children of the same empire, weren’t we? We actually lived side by side as good neighbors for centuries until the modern virus called “nationalism” descended upon us. And then hell broke loose.

[…]

I know what you think about that hell, especially about its most horrific episode, the one that took place in the year 1915. Your grandmothers must have told you about the plunderers, killers and rapists who attacked them and countless fellow Armenians. You call the whole tragedy “the Armenian Genocide” and try to convince the parliaments of the world to accept that definition. You also think, I presume, that we Turks are monsters who not only committed that horrible crime, but also refuse to take responsibility for it even after nearly a century.

This is how you see history and the present moment, right? Well, as a Turk, let me say that I understand you. Because I see that you sincerely believe in the accuracy of the historical narrative that you were raised on. How else could you have responded to that?

However, please note that there is another narrative about the tragedy of 1915, and that is what we Turks have been raised on. Our grandmothers told us that Armenians of the time collaborated with the Russian invaders and started to kill our people. Then, the narrative goes, our people started to kill the Armenians in order to both to protect themselves and to take revenge. “They killed us and so we killed them” is the summary of what 99 percent of the Turks know and think about what you call genocide. And just like you do, they sincerely believe in the accuracy of their historical narrative.

[…]

Now since we are getting to know each other, let me be a bit more blunt and take on what you have just done by convincing the U.S. Congress to pass a resolution on “the Armenian Genocide.”

If you think that acts like these will push us Turks to be more self-critical and initiate an internal discussion that will lead us to consider your narrative about 1915, you are daydreaming. The reality is quite the contrary. Foreign pressure will make Turkish society only more reactionary. Grounds for internal discussion will vanish. Moreover, our ultra-nationalist nuts will go crazier than ever. Their most militant ones might well target, once again, liberal intellectuals and our Armenian citizens. You are simply fuelling the fire.

The leaders of Turkey’s Armenian community, including Patriarch Mesrob Mutafyan II, have been warning you about these dangers and urging you to stop playing this resolution game. But sadly, you don’t ever listen to them. You accuse them for lacking courage and having a defeatist psychology. But how do you know that you yourselves are not the victims of another psychology – that of the diaspora? Social scientists repeatedly say that diaspora communities tend to go fanatic. Have you ever considered taking a hint?

If you would like to hear some friendly advice, here it is: If you really want to see more Turks reflecting on your narrative about the tragedy of 1915, initiate a genuine dialogue. Try to convince not Mrs. Pelosi and her colleagues, but us, the Turks. Write more books and articles, create better movies and Web sites, and organize fair conferences and seminars telling us about your story. And do these not as propaganda tools against the Turks, but as communication efforts toward them.

Convey your message calmly, in other words, and it will be heard. But don’t try to impose it onto us. We are not a nation of monsters, but we do have a stubborn side. When foreigners start to dictate our history to us, we tend to revert back to our grandmothers’ stories. And if we will start listening to your narrative, that will not be because we are pushed into a corner by the politics of a powerful lobby, but because our hearts are touched by the memoirs of a terrible tragedy. Sincerely,

Mustafa Akyol

A fellow Anatolian

The full letter is available on Akyol’s blog.








7 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://oneworld.blogsome.com/2007/10/19/an-open-letter-to-the-armenian-diaspora/trackback/

  1. This is the comment I left on Akyol’s blog which at time of writing is still awaiting moderation.

    Found your post via Amerikan Turk and wanted to say that I appreciate your trying to reach out in a calmer way to Armenians and so on. Also wanted to point you in the direction of an interesting article which features some interesting opinions on the Genocide resolution by a friend of mine, Yektan Turkyilmaz, and Turkish historian Taner Akcam.

    Most Turkish academics toe the official line on the horrific events of 1915. But even some of those who accept that a genocide took place believe that passing the bill now is a bad idea. Yektan Turkyilmaz, a graduate student at Duke University, has the distinction of having been arrested by the Armenian KGB because his research led them to assume he was a Turkish spy. In fact, he is part of a new generation of Turkish scholars who reject their country’s propaganda about what happened to the Armenians. In a phone interview from Duke, Turkyilmaz said, “This bill strengthens the hand of the extremists in Turkey, the xenophobes, the extreme nationalists. Yes, Turkish society has to face its past, to prevent any sort of repetition in the future. If I believed that this bill would force the Turkish government to acknowledge the truth, I would support it. But it won’t.”

    For his part, “A Shameful Act” author Taner Akcam acknowledges the force of these pragmatic arguments — but rejects them.

    “Look, we can make a list of reasons why this resolution will make matters worse,” Akcam said in a phone interview from his office at the University of Minnesota. “First, it explicitly politicizes the problem. Second, it makes a historic problem a diplomatic fight between the United States and Turkey. Third, it increases the aggressive attacks of the Turkish government against those inside and outside the country. Fourth, it increases the animosity and hatred against Armenians generally in Turkey. Fifth, it can never solve the problem. It aggravates the problem.

    “OK, so we’ve made this list,” Akcam went on. “But what is the answer? Whoever is against the resolution must show an alternative to the Armenian people. Unless you give an alternative policy, saying ‘Shut up and stop’ is not a policy. The Armenians don’t have any options. As long Turkey criminalizes the past, as long as Turkey kills journalists, as long as Turkey drags its intellectuals from court to court, as long as Turkey punishes the people who use the G-word, as long as Turkey doesn’t have any diplomatic relations with Armenia, as long as Turkey threatens everybody in the world who opens the topic of historical wrongdoing, it is the legitimate right of a victim group to make its voice heard.”

    Akcam dismisses the argument that the time was not yet ripe for the resolution. “You can use the timing argument forever and ever. Who will decide when the timing is right?”

    But Akcam argues that a long-term solution requires much more than a U.S. resolution. He says two steps are necessary: Turkey and Armenia must establish normal relations, and Turks must learn that confronting their history does not threaten their Turkish identity, but strengthens it. This means that Turks should look at the conflict not as a zero-sum game in which any Armenian gain is a Turkish loss, but as a necessary part of the process of becoming a democratic nation. It’s an approach to resolving bitter historical grievances called “transitional justice,” and it has been effective in helping resolve historical grievances between Germany and the Czech Republic, within South Africa and in other places.

    The Armenians, too, need to rethink their approach, Akcam said. In the new paradigm, the Armenian diaspora would present its policy not as being totally against Turkey, but for a new democratic Turkey. “Until now this was a conventional war between Turkey and Armenian diaspora, and congressional resolutions were the effective weapon in this conventional war,” Akcam said. “What I’m saying is we should stop thinking in these conventional ways.”

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2007/10/16/armenian_genocide/

    Some of what is said there is, I suppose, what you’re trying to say, although you appear to dispute the idea that Genocide occurred. Well, whatever the circumstances and reasons for what happened which Armenians and Turks will argue about forever it would seem, one thing is clear. That is, the term Genocide was actually coined by Raphael Lemkin with the Armenian and Jewish experiences as its basis.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

    Regardless, I have no bad feelings towards Turks. My only dislike is of nationalists on both sides. In fact, as I said in a comment on Amerikan Turk’s post, I despise nationalism in all shapes and forms. Patriotism is something different, but anyway.

    Comment by Onnik Krikorian — October 19, 2007 @ 2:32 pm

  2. Via Blogian, there’s another interesting piece from the Turkish Daily News which is again moderate, but illustrates how knee-jerk nationalist politics is in Turkey and refers to how it manifests itself in the Armenian Diaspora. Needless to say, both need to change in order for there to progress in Armenian-Turkish relations.

    There is a book on my bookcase which has been waiting for some time to be read. There is a picture on the cover of the book: Turkish and Armenian flags tied to each other. The name of the book is “The Truth Will Set Us Free” and it is written by George Jerijan, a British citizen of Armenian descent. While I was again considering reading the book I came across a newspaper article and I learned that the book had already been translated into Turkish and Mr. Ragıp Zarakoğlu, the owner of the Belge publishing house that translated and published the Turkish version of the book, is now being tried under article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code. This Thursday the directors of the weekly Armenian journal Agos were punished with one year of imprisonment under this article.

    […]

    Turkey is going to do everything in its power to stop the passage of this bill by the U.S. Congress. Every year we have the same “crisis.” This resolution appears on the agenda of the U.S. Congress and Turkey does whatever it can do stop the passage of this resolution and then we “achieve” to stop it. But no one discusses how we stop it. Do we convince the Americans that nothing like the genocide has happened in our history or is it stopped as a result of threats to American interests? How long can Turkey continue to “convince” Americans on this subject? What are we going to do with other countries that have already accepted similar resolutions in their parliaments and with those in the process of accepting them? How long can we continue this “I am not discussing it and I will not allow the discussion of this matter by anyone else!” attitude? Us versus the rest of the world! I am one of those people who believes that the discussion of and confrontation with our past is first and foremost necessary for our own “psychological health”! How long can Turkey continue with this total amnesia about some parts of its history? I think that the label, the name or qualification, of what had happened in history is not very important at the moment. Something terrible happened in these territories. […]

    […]

    On the other hand, I do not find Armenian reactions healthy either. I witnessed Armenians saying “Turks are not human beings.” I heard Armenians saying that “I cannot stand to see a Turkey on its feet.” I saw the hate in their eyes still burning! These are not healthy feelings either. Maybe they are thinking that if they do not keep their hate alive, Turkey one day will manage to convince the world that nothing happened. There are also Armenians who fight against racism towards Turks, who condemn the Armenian gentleman that sees Turks as “animals.” There are healthy, wise people on both sides and I believe they will create the future. I would like to finish this article with the remarkable comments of George Jerjian, whom I mentioned at the beginning. He says: “Armenians will need to overcome their high expectations of what Turkish recognition of the genocide will mean and, in turn, the Turks will need to overcome the serious limitations of their high school history syllabus. Reconciliation can only take place when truth and truce are declared. What happened cannot be undone, but we need not be prisoners of the past. The truth will set us- Armenian and Turk- free.”But, everything starts with courage, openness and loyalty to the truth. To be able to do this we need to discuss everything and we should be free to be able to that. Turkey should get rid of 301 and similar articles as soon as possible and Armenians should also get rid of their 301s. […]

    Comment by Onnik — October 19, 2007 @ 3:44 pm

  3. Front Page Magazine? That’s David Horowitz. The Washington Times? Reverend Sun Myung Moon. You can’t get any more ultra-right-wing-to-the-point-of-religious-nuttery than that. Intelligent design, too, is the creation of PR firms hired to introduce an archaic superstition back into the masses so that when their son’s are dying in pointless wars they won’t have to look far for “meaning” and won’t make too much noise.

    I’m sorry, but I don’t think saying that 99% of all Turks believe the Armenian Holocaust never happened amounts to anything other than confirmation of Turks’ being brainwashed by 90 years of nationalist propaganda. This guy is no “moderate,” Onnik. He’s just come up with a “friendly,” “open-minded” way of saying, “If you tell anybody I killed your mother, I’ll kill you.”

    Like I’ve said, the solution to the Armenians in Turkey problem is to document atrocities being perpetrated against them for political reasons and based on that grant them political asylum along with a nice, hefty grant from the Armenian Diaspora so that they can get their new lives in the US or Europe or South America started. That’s what political asylum is, right? The Right of Asylum. Whom will they persecute then?

    He’s right about one thing, though. Armenians do need to do a better job of propagandizing the truth among Turks.

    Comment by Armen Filadelfiatsi — October 19, 2007 @ 4:38 pm

  4. Looks like Mustafa Akyol isn’t the only one writing open letters. The Turkish Prime Minister is too, albeit in the form of an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal. Reuters has more.

    Turkey’s prime minister called for dialogue and reconciliation with Armenia on Friday as the U.S. Congress weighs whether to approve a resolution calling the 1915 massacres of Armenians by Ottoman Turks genocide.

    “While we search for ways to address this painful issue and develop our relations with Armenia, we cannot live in the past. Our sincere offer for dialogue and reconciliation is on the table,” Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan wrote in an opinion piece published in Friday’s Wall Street Journal, European edition.

    “It is incumbent on Armenia to take the next step,” he added.

    […]

    Erdogan asked in his opinion piece why Armenia was evading Turkey’s offer to establish a joint history commission to examine together the events of 1915 through bilateral dialogue. Armenia says it would consider taking part in such a history commission if its border with Turkey were opened and normal diplomatic ties established between the two countries.

    Turkey shut its border with the tiny ex-Soviet republic in 1993 to protest against Armenia’s occupation of territory inside Azerbaijan, Ankara’s close Turkic ally.

    Comment by Onnik — October 19, 2007 @ 7:24 pm

  5. Interestingly, the reality of the situation appears lost on the Armenian media and political parties with Panorama even talking as if territory inside Turkey is going to be gifted to Armenia and it’s population moved away.

    “What will we do after the resolution passes? Do we have the next five steps?” Alvard Petrosyan said speaking about the steps to be followed after the resolution on genocide passes. The reporters raised their surprise that Dashnaksutiun does not know what the next steps will be. “Isn’t Dashnaksutiun the whole nation?” also rhetorically said the Dashnak and also recalled the territories in the vicinity of Nagorno Karabakh that are not inhibited. “I am afraid of that,” she said most probably meaning that the same will happen to the lands of the Western Armenia in case they appear in our hands.

    Bizarre, and quite out of touch with any sense of logic or reality.

    Comment by Onnik — October 20, 2007 @ 1:42 am

  6. Yes, Mustafa is besides a good writer, a dear friend of me.
    There are more columnists like him.
    nice blog
    regards ffrom a dutch in istanbul

    Comment by Hans — October 20, 2007 @ 7:08 pm

  7. Is there any non-fiction book about the Turkish/Armenian questions
    that both groups think is a fair attempt at presenting arguments
    and facts on all “sides” of the issue? I just spent half an hour reading
    customer reviews of several books on the subject
    that amazon.com offers, but couldn’t find any that
    weren’t accused of unfairness, distortion, gov’t
    manipulation, etc. by at least some readers.

    Comment by Celinda Scott — December 12, 2007 @ 12:20 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Comments are currently moderated. If your comment does not appear immediately, there is no need to submit it again.

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


         

 







banner

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

The opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any publication or organization that he may be working for now, in the past or in the future.