
Komitas, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimedia 2007
You read about it first in the blogosphere here, here, here, and here, and now the mainstream media is starting to cover what many consider to be the anarchic, ill-thought out and incompetent attempt to redevelop Yerevan and ease some of the traffic congestion that has made living in in Yerevan something of a nightmare for pedestrian and motorist alike. Armenia Now backs up these concerns by reporting that there are environmental concerns about how the construction work is being carried out as well.
Although the zoning plan for Yerevan’s Kentron (central) community is still under discussion, it has already got off the drawing board causing an uproar among experts.
“The zoning plan for city center is being implemented with violation, since work began before the plan was approved. Even if it was the best tree-planting project for the center, all the same it was to have been gotten underway only after approval,” Sona Ayvazyan, an environmental expert for Transparency International Armenia, says.
[…]
Yerevan Project Institute Director Gurgen Musheghyan tries to give an answer to the issues raised by the environmentalists. He says this way a whole free area will be spared.
“The number of cars has increased in Yerevan so much today that traffic is in a paralyzed state, people stand in traffic congestions for hours. Taking into account these problems, we have decided to put the river Getar flowing through one of the city’s central thoroughfares, Khanjyan street, into a tube in order to broaden the street and allow the freed space to be used,” Musheghyan explains, angering environmentalists even further.
“There is no country where a natural structure, a river, would be shut in order to lay a transport route. Furthermore, now they envisage putting the polluted water of the Getar into tubes. And it is simply inadmissible to put polluted water not having contact with air into a closed space, taking into account the fact that the Getar was not only a water facility, but also vegetation and verdure,” says Environment Legal Protection Center chairwoman Aida Iskoyan.
According to Iskoyan, a traffic regulation program could have been developed without the proposed plan.
Khazhak Drampyan, who was Armenia’s motor transport minister in the Soviet times, also criticizes the tactics of the city authorities.
“Almost in all European countries minibuses are replaced by other means of public transportation, such as tram, bus. The number of underground stations is increased in order to keep air pollution low and relieve the traffic on the roads. But the opposite is being done in Yerevan today, since the owners of minibus services are from within the authorities and have handsome profits from their operation,” Drampyan says.
[…]
Independent experts, however, think that expecting such results in condition of widespread unauthorized construction is, to put it mildly, unrealistic.
“We do not see the mechanisms for the realization either of the master plan or the project. If our local authorities were able to manage the city properly, then today there wouldn’t be cafes at the expense of green areas. And what is happening at the crossroads of Khanjyan and Tigran Mets streets today? In the hottest spots of the city several subway passages are being dug at a time, turning traffic into a real nightmare, in the case when everything could have been done with proper calculation,” Armenian Botanical Association Chairwoman Marina Oganesova says.
(more…)